BIL vs BSCQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
BIL's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and BSCQ's 0.3 on May 31, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to BIL's 0.14%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $51.1bn for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF.
BSCQ costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; BIL is 16.7 times larger.
| BIL | BSCQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.10% |
| Net assets | $51.1bn | $3.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.8% |
| What it tracks | 1-3 month T-bills | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
BIL and BSCQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BIL follows 1-3 month T-bills and BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ.
- Number of holdings. BIL holds 18 positions and BSCQ holds 64.
- Size. BIL has $51.1bn in net assets and BSCQ $3.1bn (Net assets); BIL is 16.5 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BIL and BSCQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BIL
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About BSCQ
BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or BSCQ?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and BSCQ +3.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or BSCQ?
- BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BIL against BSCQ, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-bscq
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BIL against BSCQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-bscq
[BIL against BSCQ (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-bscq)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.