Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BGIG vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BGIG returned +16.8% to CGDV's +15.8%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BGIG and CGDV
Net assets: $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF, and $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point.
| Measure | BGIG | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.8% | +15.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, BGIG as of Jun 30, 2026 and CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.2bn | $39.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 42.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BGIG and CGDV hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
27% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BGIG and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BGIG and CGDV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Cost. BGIG charges 0.45% of assets a year and CGDV 0.33%, a gap of 0.12 points.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BGIG
BGIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BGIG or CGDV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BGIG returned +16.8% and CGDV +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BGIG or CGDV?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BGIG against CGDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-cgdv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BGIG against CGDV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-cgdv
[BGIG against CGDV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-cgdv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.