BBIN vs QEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
BBIN and QEFA hold 70% of their weight in the same names, and QEFA returned +15.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $6.5bn for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF and $1.0bn for State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF.
BBIN costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; BBIN is 6.3 times larger.
| BBIN | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $6.5bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +15.2% |
| What it tracks | Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| Holdings in common | 70% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 14.3% | 15.0% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
BBIN and QEFA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BBIN follows Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index and QEFA follows MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BBIN returned +12.9% and QEFA +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.3 points.
- Cost. BBIN charges 0.07% of assets a year and QEFA 0.30%, a gap of 0.23 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BBIN and QEFA hold 70% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
70% in common
On the same fields
BBIN and QEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BBIN
BBIN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 628 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QEFA
QEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 626 positions, with the top ten at 15.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BBIN or QEFA?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BBIN returned +12.9% and QEFA +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BBIN or QEFA?
- BBIN is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BBIN against QEFA, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbin-vs-qefa
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BBIN against QEFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbin-vs-qefa
[BBIN against QEFA (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbin-vs-qefa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.