Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVLV vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVLV returned +29.6% to IWF's +0.9%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVLV and IWF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $22.4bn for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
AVLV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.7 points; IWF is 5.6 times larger.
| Measure | AVLV | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.6% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $22.4bn | $124.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.8% | 57.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 264 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: AVLV against IWD, Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
AVLV returned more: +100.3% to +77.8%. AVLV swung less: 16.0% to 20.6%. AVLV fell less at its worst: −18.3% to −32.5%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | AVLV | IWF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +100.3% | +77.8% | AVLV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +14.7% | +12.0% | AVLV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +84.5% | +72.7% | AVLV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.0% | 20.6% | AVLV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.2% | 13.7% | AVLV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −18.3% | −32.5% | AVLV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 108.3% | 99.8% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.6% | 100.1% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.06 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.91 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.69 | 0.46 | AVLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 0.70 | AVLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.104 | 0.149 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.80 | 0.37 | AVLV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWD | VONG | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +2.0% a year | −0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.94 | −0.58 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.2% to +6.1% | −0.6% to +0.3% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.52 | −0.11 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.8% | 1.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 264 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IWF hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVLV and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AVLV follows No index, actively managed and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVLV returned +29.6% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 28.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
AVLV
AVLV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 298 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +29.6% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or IWF?
- AVLV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVLV against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVLV against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-iwf
[AVLV against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.