Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVLV vs CATH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVLV returned +29.6% to CATH's +10.9%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVLV and CATH
Net assets: $22.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF, and $1.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF.
Pair scorecard
AVLV costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.7 points; AVLV is 15.7 times larger.
| Measure | AVLV | CATH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.6% | +10.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $22.0bn | $1.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.8% | 39.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and CATH hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVLV and CATH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV and CATH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AVLV follows No index, actively managed and CATH follows S&P 500 Catholic Values Index.
- Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVLV returned +29.6% and CATH +10.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 18.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value.
AVLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 298 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
CATH
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 445 positions, with the top ten at 39.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or CATH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +29.6% and CATH +10.9%.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or CATH?
- AVLV is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVLV against CATH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-cath
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVLV against CATH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-cath
[AVLV against CATH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-cath)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.