Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVLV vs BLCR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVLV returned +29.6% to BLCR's +18.8%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVLV and BLCR
Net assets: $22.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF, and $9.8bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF.
Pair scorecard
AVLV costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; AVLV is 2.3 times larger.
| Measure | AVLV | BLCR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.6% | +18.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on May 29, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $22.4bn | $9.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.8% | 48.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and BLCR hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVLV and BLCR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV and BLCR do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVLV returned +29.6% and BLCR +18.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
- Number of holdings. AVLV holds 298 positions and BLCR holds 51.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value.
AVLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 298 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
BLCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 48.3%. It sat 3.1% below its high of May 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or BLCR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +29.6% and BLCR +18.8%.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or BLCR?
- AVLV is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVLV against BLCR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-blcr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVLV against BLCR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-blcr
[AVLV against BLCR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-blcr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.