Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVDV vs IWB: how they differ

AVDV and IWB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVDV and IWB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVDV and IWB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVDVIWB
Webuild SpA0.17%0.10%
d'Amico International Shipping SA0.10%0.27%
Perseus Mining Ltd0.63%0.06%
Resolute Mining Ltd0.34%0.06%
Panoro Energy ASA0.02%0.02%
Cuscal Ltd0.01%0.04%
AMG Critical Materials NV0.06%0.01%
Australian Finance Group Ltd0.01%0.01%
Billerud Aktiebolag0.14%0.01%
Computacenter PLC0.38%0.01%
Credito Emiliano SpA0.03%0.01%
FLSmidth & Co A/S0.07%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVDVOnly in IWB
AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72%NVIDIA 7.26%
Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38%APPLE 6.73%
Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74%MICROSOFT 5.21%
Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67%AMAZON.COM INC 3.49%
OceanaGold Corp 0.63%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77%
Coeur Mining Inc 0.61%BROADCOM INC 2.40%
Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61%ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24%
B2Gold Corp 0.59%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

AVDV and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isInternational Small Cap ValueRussell 1000
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+16.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−0.8 pts
Expense ratio0.36%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%91.9%
Holdings1751945

AVDV in plain words

AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVDV or IWB?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVDV returned +31.0% and IWB returned +16.7%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVDV or IWB?
AVDV charges 0.36% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVDV and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVDV and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVDV against IWB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVDV against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avdv-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources