Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMXC vs IWB: how they differ
EMXC and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EMXC | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD | 0.09% | 0.04% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| BUDIMEX SA | 0.02% | 0.07% |
| JBS N V NV CLASS A | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) CORINTH REFINER | 0.05% | 0.01% |
| MTN GROUP | 0.21% | 0.01% |
| SANLAM LIMITED LTD | 0.09% | 0.01% |
| XP CLASS A INC | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| Only in EMXC | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 18.85% | NVIDIA 7.26% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 9.26% | APPLE 6.73% |
| SK HYNIX 7.53% | MICROSOFT 5.21% |
| MEDIATEK 2.12% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.20% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS 1.02% | BROADCOM INC 2.40% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 0.96% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% |
| HDFC BANK 0.81% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.5% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +38.0 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 597 | 945 |
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 597 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and IWB returned +16.7%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMXC or IWB?
- EMXC charges 0.25% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EMXC and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources