Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWJ vs IWB: how they differ
EWJ and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWJ returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Japan ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EWJ | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| CASH COLLATERAL JPY SGAFT | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Only in EWJ | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.70% | NVIDIA 7.26% |
| TOYOTA MOTOR 3.41% | APPLE 6.73% |
| SOFTBANK GROUP 3.04% | MICROSOFT 5.21% |
| SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 3.01% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% |
| ADVANTEST 2.98% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON 2.82% | BROADCOM INC 2.40% |
| HITACHI 2.75% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% |
| KIOXIA HOLDINGS 2.68% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Japan | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.5% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.0 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 171 | 945 |
EWJ in plain words
EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 171 positions, with the top ten at 30.4%.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and IWB returned +16.7%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWJ or IWB?
- EWJ charges 0.49% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWJ and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWJ against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources