Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IWB's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and IWB

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.15%
IWB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; AGG is 2.9 times larger.

AGG vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGIWB
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexRussell 1000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$139.3bn$48.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG IWB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +13.2% (VONE)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −0.1 pts vs VONE
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.15%
Holdings 13469 1025
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $49.1bn

AGG and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IWB +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IWB?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.