Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IWB's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and IWBNet assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
AGG costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; AGG is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | AGG | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $139.3bn | $48.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or IWB?
- AGG is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwb
[AGG against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.