Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVDV vs IEMG: how they differ
AVDV and IEMG hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVDV and IEMG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVDV | IEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cuscal Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Mears Group PLC | 0.03% | 0.01% |
| Myer Holdings Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| SKYCITY Entertainment Group Ltd | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| Digital Bros SpA | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| Peet Ltd | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Energix-Renewable Energies Ltd | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| CPI Europe AG | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| Jadestone Energy PLC | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| Klaveness Combination Carriers ASA | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA | 0.00% | 0.08% |
| Only in AVDV | Only in IEMG |
|---|---|
| AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 13.46% |
| Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.62% |
| Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74% | SK HYNIX 5.38% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67% | TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.35% |
| OceanaGold Corp 0.63% | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.61% |
| Perseus Mining Ltd 0.63% | MEDIATEK 1.52% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 0.61% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.86% |
| Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | iShares |
| What it is | International Small Cap Value | Core MSCI Emerging Markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.0% | +30.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.5 pts | +13.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1751 | 1832 |
AVDV in plain words
AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1832 positions, with the top ten at 34.0%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVDV or IEMG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVDV returned +31.0% and IEMG returned +30.6%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVDV or IEMG?
- AVDV charges 0.36% a year and IEMG charges 0.09%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVDV and IEMG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVDV and 0% of IEMG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVDV against IEMG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avdv-vs-iemg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources