Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWJ vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWJ returned +18.1% to IEMG's +15.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWJ and IEMG

Net assets: $23.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Japan ETF, and $150.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IEMG is 6.3 times larger.

EWJ vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJIEMG
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+15.3%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 202610.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Japan IndexMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$23.8bn$150.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%32.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 729 weekly returns
EWJ IEMG
Return
Total return edge EWJ +234.4% +120.7%
Annualized edge EWJ +9.0% +5.8%
Price return edge EWJ +159.1% +56.0%
Risk
Volatility edge EWJ (slight) 17.1% 18.2%
Max drawdown edge EWJ −32.5% −37.1%
Downside capture 87.1% 97.1%
Beta 0.76 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EWJ 0.48 0.30
Sortino edge EWJ 0.69 0.42
Treynor 0.071 0.057
Calmar edge EWJ 0.28 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.6% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.65 2.17
Information ratio 0.03 0.38
Tracking error 11.6% 1.4%

Each against its own benchmark: EWJ against ACWX, Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; IEMG against EEM, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWJ returned more: +234.4% to +120.7%. EWJ swung slightly less: 17.1% to 18.2%. EWJ fell less at its worst: −32.5% to −37.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWJ vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJIEMGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+234.4%+120.7%EWJPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.0%+5.8%EWJTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+159.1%+56.0%EWJPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.1%18.2%EWJ (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.9%13.0%EWJ (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.5%−37.1%EWJDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture75.1%94.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture87.1%97.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.760.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.671.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.480.30EWJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.690.42EWJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0710.057Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.280.16EWJAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.6% a year+0.7% a yearEWJ not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.652.17Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.2% to +6.4%+0.1% to +1.4%EWJ includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.030.38Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.6%1.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 729 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and IEMG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWJ IEMG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWJ
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59%
ADVANTEST 3.03%
HITACHI 3.03%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03%
SONY GROUP 2.89%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55%
Only in IEMG
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 14.03%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.05%
SK HYNIX 4.31%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.32%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.60%
MEDIATEK 1.36%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.80%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Japan Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets
Total return, 1 year +18.1% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs ACWX −1.0 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 169 2857
Net assets, EWJ as of Oct 28, 2026 and IEMG as of Oct 27, 2026 $23.9bn $150.4bn

EWJ and IEMG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CD7228B9FB

EWJ and IEMG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWJ follows MSCI Japan Index and IEMG follows MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI).
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWJ returned +18.1% and IEMG +15.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWJ and IEMG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or IEMG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +18.1% and IEMG +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or IEMG?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and IEMG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 0% of IEMG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWJ against IEMG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-iemg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.