Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to IEMG's +15.3%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and IEMG

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $150.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 64.4 points; IEMG is 6.6 times larger.

EWY vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIEMG
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+15.3%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 202610.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$148.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common16%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%32.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 729 weekly returns · each against EEM
EWY IEMG
Return
Total return edge EWY +234.0% +120.7%
Annualized edge EWY +9.0% +5.8%
Price return edge EWY +161.4% +56.0%
Risk
Volatility edge IEMG 26.0% 18.2%
Max drawdown edge IEMG −49.7% −37.1%
Downside capture 105.0% 97.1%
Beta 1.15 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EWY 0.39 0.30
Sortino edge EWY 0.57 0.42
Treynor 0.089 0.057
Calmar edge EWY 0.18 0.16
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.5% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.16 2.17
Information ratio 0.35 0.38
Tracking error 14.7% 1.4%
Reading

EWY returned more: +234.0% to +120.7%. IEMG swung less: 18.2% to 26.0%. IEMG fell less at its worst: −37.1% to −49.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIEMGEEMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+234.0%+120.7%EWYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.0%+5.8%EWYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+161.4%+56.0%EWYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.0%18.2%IEMGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.7%13.0%IEMGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.7%−37.1%IEMGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture125.8%94.6%100.0%EWYShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture105.0%97.1%100.0%IEMG (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.150.961.00IEMG lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.691.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.30EWYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.42EWYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0890.0570.049EWYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.180.16EWYAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMEEMEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.5% a year+0.7% a year0.0%IEMG significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.162.17Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.1% to +12.1%+0.1% to +1.4%EWY's includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.350.38IEMG (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.7%1.4%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 729 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

16%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and IEMG hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

16% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY IEMG
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14% 6.05%
SK HYNIX 23.11% 4.31%
SK SQUARE 2.78% 0.45%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67% 0.39%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06% 0.29%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51% 0.23%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54% 0.21%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39% 0.18%
SAMSUNG SDI LTD 1.38% 0.18%
CELLTRION 1.35% 0.17%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY LTD 1.12% 0.15%
HANWHA AEROSPACE LTD 1.11% 0.15%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
KOSPI2 INDEX DEC 26 0.00%
KRW/USD 0.00%
Only in IEMG
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 14.03%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.32%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.60%
MEDIATEK 1.36%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 0.72%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.70%
HDFC BANK 0.63%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM −1.0 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 78 2857
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and IEMG as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $150.4bn

EWY and IEMG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-335457C809

EWY and IEMG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and IEMG follows MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI).
  2. Holdings in common. 16% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and IEMG +15.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 64.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY and IEMG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or IEMG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and IEMG +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or IEMG?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and IEMG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 0% of IEMG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against IEMG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-iemg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.