Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to EWY's +79.7%; 23% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and EWY

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and $24.4bn for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.59%
EWY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EMXC costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 45.9 points; EMXC is 1.1 times larger.

EMXC vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCEWY
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+79.7%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 202624.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.59%
Net assets$26.9bn$24.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common23%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC EWY
Return
Total return edge EWY +122.9% +161.1%
Annualized edge EWY +9.1% +10.9%
Price return edge EWY +80.5% +118.6%
Risk
Volatility edge EMXC 19.2% 29.2%
Max drawdown edge EMXC −40.7% −49.7%
Downside capture 97.9% 103.2%
Beta 0.97 1.08
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.41 0.41
Sortino edge EWY (slight) 0.57 0.60
Treynor 0.098 0.124
Calmar edge Tie 0.22 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year +2.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 0.83
Information ratio −0.30 0.22
Tracking error 3.6% 14.8%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWY returned more: +161.1% to +122.9%. EMXC swung less: 19.2% to 29.2%. EMXC fell less at its worst: −40.7% to −49.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs EWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCEWYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+161.1%EWYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+10.9%EWYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+118.6%EWYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%29.2%EMXCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%20.0%EMXCLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−49.7%EMXCDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%115.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%103.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.08Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.41TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.60EWY (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.124Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.22TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year+2.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.590.83Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−3.4% to +8.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%14.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

23%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and EWY hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

23% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58% 23.14%
SK HYNIX 6.12% 23.11%
SK SQUARE 0.63% 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 0.56% 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 0.41% 2.06%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 0.32% 1.51%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 0.30% 1.54%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 0.25% 1.39%
SAMSUNG SDI LTD 0.25% 1.38%
CELLTRION 0.24% 1.35%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY LTD 0.22% 1.12%
HANWHA AEROSPACE LTD 0.21% 1.11%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
ICICI BANK 0.84%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD 0.79%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 0.73%
Only in EWY
KOSPI2 INDEX DEC 26 0.00%
LOTTE SHOPPING LTD 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks the MSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +79.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +63.4 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 696 78
Net assets $26.9bn $24.4bn

EMXC and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4360ACB22C

EMXC and EWY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 23% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and EWY +79.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 45.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC and EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or EWY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and EWY +79.7%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or EWY?
EMXC is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and EWY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 0% of EWY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against EWY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-ewy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.