Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and TLT

Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 15.7 points; TLT is 12.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

AOR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.9bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +7.8% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 7 47
Net assets, AOR as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.9bn $47.4bn

AOR and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or TLT?
Neither: AOR and TLT both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.