Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
HYMB vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
HYMB's duration was 7.3 years on Jun 30, 2026 and TLT's 15.1 on Aug 31, 2026; TLT charges 0.15% to HYMB's 0.35%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HYMB and TLTNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.8bn for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; TLT is 12.5 times larger.
| Measure | HYMB | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.0% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Jul 2, 2026 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.8bn | $47.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
HYMB and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYMB
HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned −1.0% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, HYMB or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HYMB against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). HYMB against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-tlt
[HYMB against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hymb-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.