Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IWC's +16.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and IWC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.60%
IWC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.57 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.9 points; AGG is far larger, $139.4bn against $1.2bn.

AGG vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGIWC
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+16.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20209.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexRussell Microcap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$1.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG IWC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in IWC
CAREDX 0.88%
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59%
OUSTER 0.53%
INTERFACE 0.52%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the Russell Microcap
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ +3.2 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.60%
Holdings 13469 1365
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $1.2bn

AGG and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and IWC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IWC +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IWC?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.