Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BNDX vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNDX returned −0.9% to IWC's +16.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BNDX and IWC

Net assets: $82.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−0.9%
BNDX total return, 1 year
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
0.07%
BNDX expense ratio
0.60%
IWC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BNDX costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.4 points; BNDX is far larger, $82.9bn against $1.4bn.

BNDX vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDXIWC
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.9%+16.5%
Drawdown
Below its high9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged)Russell Microcap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.60%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$82.9bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BNDX IWC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BNDX
MKTLIQ 0.93%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.39%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.35%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.34%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.33%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.31%
Only in IWC
CAREDX 0.88%
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59%
OUSTER 0.53%
INTERFACE 0.52%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Total International Bond Tracks the Russell Microcap
Total return, 1 year −0.9% +16.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +3.2 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.60%
Holdings 6840 1365
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 $82.9bn $1.2bn

BNDX and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BNDX

BNDX tracks an index of Total International Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or IWC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.9% and IWC +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or IWC?
BNDX is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BNDX against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-iwc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.