Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LALT vs QIS: Correlation to the S&P 500
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QIS moved less with the S&P 500 than LALT: correlation +0.03 against +0.34.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LALT and QIS
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $442m for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF and $47m for Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF.
LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.
QIS in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, QIS −2.05%.
Pair scorecard
QIS costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.8 points; LALT is 9.4 times larger.
| Measure | LALT | QIS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.0% | −45.8% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.18% | 1.13% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $442m | $47m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.17: about 0.17% for each 1% | +0.10: about 0.10% for each 1% |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.10% | fell 2.05% |
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | LALT | QIS |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +8.2% |
| 6 months | 0.0% | −21.8% |
| 1 year | +12.0% | −45.8% |
| 3 years | +33.7% | −58.5% |
| Since launchNot the same days: LALT Feb 2023 · QIS Jul 2023 | +34.3% | −57.4% |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
One strategy, two funds
LALT and QIS both run a multi-strategy strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, LALT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and QIS’s +0.03. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, LALT averaged −0.10% and QIS −2.05%. Over the same weeks, LALT finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash and QIS finished 50.7 points behind cash.
LALT
LALT is a multi-strategy fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.17, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.17% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks LALT fell 0.10% on average, a down-week capture of 8.9%. Over the same 52 weeks LALT returned +11.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash.
QIS
QIS is a multi-strategy fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.03 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.10, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.10% the same way. In the same weeks QIS fell 2.05% on average, a down-week capture of 191.0%. Over the same 52 weeks QIS returned −47.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 50.7 percentage points behind cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, LALT or QIS?
- Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, LALT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and QIS’s +0.03, so QIS moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, LALT or QIS?
- In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, LALT averaged −0.10% and QIS −2.05%, so LALT returned more in those weeks.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LALT against QIS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/lalt-vs-qis
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LALT against QIS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/lalt-vs-qis
[LALT against QIS (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/lalt-vs-qis)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.