Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

LALT vs QAI: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LALT moved less with the S&P 500 than QAI: correlation +0.34 against +0.89.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LALT and QAI

Net assets: $442m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF, and $1.0bn on Jul 31, 2026 for NYLIM Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF.

At a glance
+0.34
LALT correlation with the S&P 500
+0.89
QAI correlation with the S&P 500
8.9%
LALT down-week capture
50.9%
QAI down-week capture
LALT Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.SPY−1.07%LALT−0.10%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.SPY−1.07%LALT−0.10%Average week when SPY fell

LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.

QAI Fell 51% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 51% as much as the S&P 500QAI in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, QAI −0.54%.SPY−1.07%QAI−0.54%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 51% as much as the S&P 500QAI in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, QAI −0.54%.SPY−1.07%QAI−0.54%Average week when SPY fell

QAI in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, QAI −0.54%.

Pair scorecard

QAI costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points.

LALT vs QAI: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureLALTQAI
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+7.7%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.18%0.81%
Net assets, LALT as of Nov 3, 2026 and QAI as of Jul 31, 2026$442m$1.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.17: about 0.17% for each 1%+0.45: about 0.45% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.10%fell 0.54%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 194 weekly returns
LALT QAI
Return
Total return edge LALT +36.5% +31.3%
Annualized edge LALT +8.7% +7.6%
Price return edge LALT +24.5% +21.5%
Risk
Volatility edge LALT 4.8% 5.6%
Max drawdown edge LALT −4.1% −6.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge LALT 0.80 0.51
Sortino edge LALT 1.18 0.72
Calmar edge LALT 2.11 1.20
Reading

From Feb 2023 to Oct 2026, LALT returned more: +36.5% to +31.3%. LALT swung less: 4.8% to 5.6%. LALT fell less at its worst: −4.1% to −6.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: LALT vs QAI: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureLALTQAIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+36.5%+31.3%LALTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.7%+7.6%LALTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+24.5%+21.5%LALTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.8%5.6%LALTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.3%4.0%LALTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−4.1%−6.3%LALTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.800.51LALTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.180.72LALTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar2.111.20LALTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 194 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: LALT vs QAI: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowLALTQAILALTQAI
3 months+1.9%−2.0%not measured−1.7 pts vs IWV
6 months0.0%−1.3%not measured−6.2 pts vs IWV
1 year+12.0%+7.7%not measured−7.1 pts vs IWV
3 years+33.7%+28.1%not measured−52.9 pts vs IWV
Since launchNot the same days: LALT Feb 2023 · QAI Mar 2009+34.3%+79.4%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · Multi-strategy fund: runs several alternative strategies at once, or aims to return what hedge funds as a group return QAI NYLIM Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF · Multi-strategy fund: runs several alternative strategies at once, or aims to return what hedge funds as a group return
Strategy Multi-strategy Multi-strategy
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.34 +0.89
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.17 +0.45
Down-week capture 8.9% 50.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.10% −0.54%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +11.6% +7.1%
Against T-bills, percentage points +8.0 pts +3.5 pts
Expense ratio 1.18% 0.81%
First traded Feb 1, 2023 Mar 25, 2009
Net assets, LALT as of Nov 3, 2026 and QAI as of Jul 31, 2026 $442m $1.0bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

LALT and QAI both run a multi-strategy strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, LALT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and QAI’s +0.89. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, LALT averaged −0.10% and QAI −0.54%. Over the same weeks, LALT finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash and QAI finished 3.5 points ahead of cash.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

LALT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LALT

LALT is a multi-strategy fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.17, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.17% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks LALT fell 0.10% on average, a down-week capture of 8.9%. Over the same 52 weeks LALT returned +11.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash.

QAI

QAI is a multi-strategy fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.89 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.45, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.45% the same way. In the same weeks QAI fell 0.54% on average, a down-week capture of 50.9%. Over the same 52 weeks QAI returned +7.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, LALT or QAI?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, LALT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and QAI’s +0.89, so LALT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, LALT or QAI?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, LALT averaged −0.10% and QAI −0.54%, so LALT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, LALT or QAI?
Over the same weeks, LALT finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash and QAI finished 3.5 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, LALT or QAI?
LALT charges 1.18% a year and QAI charges 0.81%, so QAI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LALT against QAI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/lalt-vs-qai

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.