Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

HFND vs LALT: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LALT moved less with the S&P 500 than HFND: correlation +0.34 against +0.82.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HFND and LALT

Net assets: $39m on Aug 31, 2026 for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF, and $442m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF.

At a glance
+0.82
HFND correlation with the S&P 500
+0.34
LALT correlation with the S&P 500
76.4%
HFND down-week capture
8.9%
LALT down-week capture
HFND Fell 76% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 76% as much as the S&P 500HFND in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFND −0.82%.SPY−1.07%HFND−0.82%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 76% as much as the S&P 500HFND in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFND −0.82%.SPY−1.07%HFND−0.82%Average week when SPY fell

HFND in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HFND −0.82%.

LALT Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.SPY−1.07%LALT−0.10%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 9% as much as the S&P 500LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.SPY−1.07%LALT−0.10%Average week when SPY fell

LALT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, LALT −0.10%.

Pair scorecard

HFND costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points.

HFND vs LALT: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureHFNDLALT
Return
Total return, 1 year+3.2%+12.0%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.07%1.18%
Net assets, HFND as of Aug 31, 2026 and LALT as of Nov 3, 2026$39m$442m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.58: about 0.58% for each 1%+0.17: about 0.17% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.82%fell 0.10%

Method

Window by window

Window by window: HFND vs LALT: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total return
WindowHFNDLALT
3 months−4.2%+1.9%
6 months−3.6%0.0%
1 year+3.2%+12.0%
3 years+27.8%+33.7%
Since launchNot the same days: HFND Oct 2022 · LALT Feb 2023+30.8%+34.3%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

HFND Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF · Multi-strategy fund: runs several alternative strategies at once, or aims to return what hedge funds as a group return LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · Multi-strategy fund: runs several alternative strategies at once, or aims to return what hedge funds as a group return
Strategy Multi-strategy Multi-strategy
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.82 +0.34
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.58 +0.17
Down-week capture 76.4% 8.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.82% −0.10%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +3.6% +11.6%
Against T-bills, percentage points −0.1 pts +8.0 pts
Expense ratio 1.07% 1.18%
First traded Oct 11, 2022 Feb 1, 2023
Net assets, HFND as of Aug 31, 2026 and LALT as of Nov 3, 2026 $39m $442m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

HFND and LALT both run a multi-strategy strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, HFND’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.82 with the S&P 500 and LALT’s +0.34. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, HFND averaged −0.82% and LALT −0.10%. Over the same weeks, HFND finished 0.1 percentage points behind cash and LALT finished 8.0 points ahead of cash.

Alert

LALT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HFND

HFND is a multi-strategy fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.82 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.58, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.58% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks HFND fell 0.82% on average, a down-week capture of 76.4%. Over the same 52 weeks HFND returned +3.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 0.1 percentage points behind cash.

LALT

LALT is a multi-strategy fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.17, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.17% the same way. In the same weeks LALT fell 0.10% on average, a down-week capture of 8.9%. Over the same 52 weeks LALT returned +11.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, HFND or LALT?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, HFND’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.82 with the S&P 500 and LALT’s +0.34, so LALT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, HFND or LALT?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, HFND averaged −0.82% and LALT −0.10%, so LALT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, HFND or LALT?
Over the same weeks, HFND finished 0.1 percentage points behind cash and LALT finished 8.0 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, HFND or LALT?
HFND charges 1.07% a year and LALT charges 1.18%, so HFND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HFND against LALT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/hfnd-vs-lalt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.