Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HOLD vs TFPN: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TFPN moved less with the S&P 500 than HOLD: correlation +0.46 against +0.57.

Harbor Alpha Layering ETF and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF.

+0.57HOLD correlation with the S&P 500
+0.46TFPN correlation with the S&P 500
39.5%HOLD down-week capture
25.7%TFPN down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: TFPN scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

HOLD 44TFPN 52.44.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

HOLDFell 40% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HOLD−0.49%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HOLD−0.49%Average week when SPY fell
TFPNFell 26% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%TFPN−0.32%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%TFPN−0.32%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

HOLD and TFPN both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, HOLD’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.57 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.46. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, HOLD averaged −0.49% and TFPN −0.32%. Over the same weeks, HOLD finished 10.2 percentage points ahead of cash and TFPN finished 18.9 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

HOLD and TFPN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
HOLDTFPNHOLDTFPN
3 months−0.8%−6.7%−3.1 pts−9.0 pts
6 months+8.9%+10.2%−9.1 pts−7.8 pts
1 year+14.0%+24.3%−2.6 pts+7.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+23.5%not published−54.9 pts
Since launch+16.8%+23.2%−2.9 pts−54.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HOLD and TFPN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HOLD
Harbor Alpha Layering ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerHarborBlueprint
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.57+0.46
Beta to the S&P 500+0.60+0.49
Down-week capture39.5%25.7%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.49%−0.32%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+13.8%+22.5%
Against T-bills, percentage points+10.2 pts+18.9 pts
Expense ratio0.70%1.96%
ListedAug 14, 2025Jul 12, 2023
Net assets$8m$170m

HOLD in plain words

HOLD is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.57 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.60, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.60% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks HOLD fell 0.49% on average, a down-week capture of 39.5%. Over the same 52 weeks HOLD returned +13.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 10.2 percentage points ahead of cash.

TFPN in plain words

TFPN is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.46 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.49, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.49% the same way. In the same weeks TFPN fell 0.32% on average, a down-week capture of 25.7%. Over the same 52 weeks TFPN returned +22.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 18.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, HOLD or TFPN?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, HOLD’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.57 with the S&P 500 and TFPN’s +0.46, so TFPN moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, HOLD or TFPN?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, HOLD averaged −0.49% and TFPN −0.32%, so TFPN returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, HOLD or TFPN?
Over the same weeks, HOLD finished 10.2 percentage points ahead of cash and TFPN finished 18.9 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, HOLD or TFPN?
HOLD charges 0.70% a year and TFPN charges 1.96%, so HOLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HOLD against TFPN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HOLD against TFPN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/hold-vs-tfpn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources