Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, AHLT or HOLD?

In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, AHLT averaged −0.88% and HOLD −1.29%, so AHLT returned more in those weeks.

Which earned more than cash, AHLT or HOLD?

Over the same weeks, AHLT finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash and HOLD finished 3.3 percentage points behind cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.

Which is cheaper, AHLT or HOLD?

AHLT charges 0.96% a year and HOLD charges 0.70%, so HOLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Alternative ETFs

AHLT vs HOLD: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AHLT moved less with the S&P 500 than HOLD: correlation +0.47 against +0.66.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AHLT and HOLD

Net assets: $131m on Jul 31, 2026 for AHL Trend ETF, and $3.9m on Nov 4, 2026 for Harbor Alpha Layering ETF.

AHLT on its own →HOLD on its own →

At a glance

+0.47

AHLT correlation with the S&P 500

+0.66

HOLD correlation with the S&P 500

81.7%

AHLT down-week capture

120.5%

HOLD down-week capture

AHLT Fell 82% as much as the S&P 500

AHLT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, AHLT −0.88%.

HOLD Fell more than the S&P 500

HOLD in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HOLD −1.29%.

Pair scorecard

HOLD costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.5 points.

AHLT vs HOLD: Correlation to the S&P 500
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Return
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Total return, 1 year	+19.3%	+0.8%
Against its benchmark
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Treasury bills, 52 weeks	+3.7%
Cost and size
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Expense ratio	0.96%	0.70%
Net assets, AHLT as of Jul 31, 2026 and HOLD as of Nov 4, 2026	$131m	$3.9m
Holdings
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Holdings in common	not published
Risk
Measure	AHLT	HOLD
Beta to the S&P 500	+0.58: about 0.58% for each 1%	+0.81: about 0.81% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fell	fell 0.88%	fell 1.29%

ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · AHLT scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

IQ Alternatives Score41.2AHLT17.6HOLD

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

AHLT 41.2

HOLD 17.6

2.9, the lowest in this set 94.2, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: AHLT vs HOLD: Correlation to the S&P 500
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	AHLT	HOLD	AHLT	HOLD
3 months	+2.3%	−3.1%	not measured	−3.0 pts vs VOO
6 months	+0.3%	−7.5%	not measured	−12.5 pts vs VOO
1 year	+19.3%	+0.8%	not measured	−14.0 pts vs VOO
3 years	+22.1%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: AHLT Aug 2023 · HOLD Aug 2025	+22.2%	+10.3%	not measured	−10.3 pts vs VOO

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

AHLT AHL Trend ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises HOLD Harbor Alpha Layering ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises

Issuer American Beacon Harbor

Strategy Managed futures Managed futures

Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.47 +0.66

Beta to the S&P 500 +0.58 +0.81

Down-week capture 81.7% 120.5%

Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.88% −1.29%

The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%

Total return, same 52 weeks +18.3% +0.3%

Against T-bills, percentage points +14.7 pts −3.3 pts

Expense ratio 0.96% 0.70%

First traded Aug 31, 2023 Aug 14, 2025

Net assets, AHLT as of Jul 31, 2026 and HOLD as of Nov 4, 2026 $131m $3.9m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

AHLT and HOLD both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, AHLT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500 and HOLD’s +0.66. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, AHLT averaged −0.88% and HOLD −1.29%. Over the same weeks, AHLT finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash and HOLD finished 3.3 points behind cash.

Alert

About each fund

AHLT

AHLT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.58, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.58% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks AHLT fell 0.88% on average, a down-week capture of 81.7%. Over the same 52 weeks AHLT returned +18.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

HOLD

HOLD is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.66 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.81, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.81% the same way. In the same weeks HOLD fell 1.29% on average, a down-week capture of 120.5%. Over the same 52 weeks HOLD returned +0.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.3 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, AHLT or HOLD?: Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, AHLT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500 and HOLD’s +0.66, so AHLT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, AHLT or HOLD?: In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, AHLT averaged −0.88% and HOLD −1.29%, so AHLT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, AHLT or HOLD?: Over the same weeks, AHLT finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash and HOLD finished 3.3 percentage points behind cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, AHLT or HOLD?: AHLT charges 0.96% a year and HOLD charges 0.70%, so HOLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

AHLT vs HFMF AHLT vs PRAE AHLT vs ISMF AHLT vs MFUT HOLD vs RSBT HOLD vs TFPN HOLD vs WTMF HOLD vs FMF

Where to next

BIL, the T-bill fund these are measured against →SPY, the S&P 500 fund these are measured against →AHLT on its own →HOLD on its own →AHLT dividend history →HOLD dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

AHLT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

AHLT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

American Beacon website ↗

HOLD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

HOLD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Harbor page for HOLD ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AHLT against HOLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/ahlt-vs-hold

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.