ETFIQ Research · rebuilt every trading night

The stated multiple and what the holder got

Over the three months to Oct 27, 2026, 510 of 661 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their own stated multiple. The median fund finished -5.5 points from its stated multiple.

These funds deliver the multiple over a single day and reset. Daily results compound, so a run of days is not the multiple times the period's move, and the gap widens with how far the underlying travels rather than with where it ends up. 129 underlyings carry the same stated multiple from more than one issuer. Same mandate, same days, and the spread between the closest and the furthest is in the second table.

Short of the stated multiple, by holding period
One month
358 of 692
Three months
510 of 661
Six months
322 of 431
One year
205 of 289
Three years
60 of 92

510 of 661 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their stated multiple over three months to Oct 27, 2026.

Short of the stated multiple, by the underlying’s volatility
0% to 30%
113 of 181
30% to 50%
111 of 150
50% to 80%
181 of 206
80% and above
105 of 124

510 of 661 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their stated multiple over three months to Oct 27, 2026, grouped by how much the underlying moved.

How far from the stated multiple, by how long it was held

How far from the stated multiple, by how long it was held
WindowFundsShort of statedMedian differenceMedian distanceMedian underlying volatility
One month692358 of 692−0.6%1.7%44%
Three months661510 of 661−5.5%6.7%50%
Six months431322 of 431−8.5%9.8%45%
One year289205 of 289−10.8%13.6%35%
Three years9260 of 92−22.8%38.0%18%

The same trade from more than one issuer, widest spread first

The same trade from more than one issuer, widest spread first
OnIssuersUnderlying movedClosest to statedFurthestSpread
NXPI +2x2−1.7%NXPG -8.5NXPX -25.416.9%
BABA +2x4−13.0%KBAB +10.7BABU -3.113.8%
PDD +2x2−8.5%KPDD +2.3PDDL -4.97.2%
PLTR +2x5+60.9%PLTU +6.7PLTG +0.95.8%
IONQ +2x3−2.7%IONC -14.7IONX -19.64.9%
RGTI +2x3−14.3%RGTC -9.4RGTX -14.34.9%
SNDK +2x4+19.0%SNXX -25.6SNDC -30.44.8%
BMNR +2x3+23.1%BNMC -19.0BMNG -23.64.6%
HIMS +2x2−4.8%HIMC -14.6HIMZ -19.14.5%
ONDS +2x4−15.4%ONDG -9.8ONDL -14.04.2%
SPCX +2x7+27.6%SPCM -14.6SPCU -18.64.0%
NOW +2x2+39.9%NOWX +0.1NOWL -3.94.0%

Erosion against the underlying’s volatility, three months

Erosion against the underlying’s volatility, three months
Underlying volatilityFundsMedian volatilityMedian difference from statedShort of stated
0% to 30%18116%−1.8%113 of 181
30% to 50%15039%−4.2%111 of 150
50% to 80%20667%−11.6%181 of 206
80% and above12493%−18.8%105 of 124
Method

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation from Tiingo end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested, measured against the fund’s own underlying over exactly the same days. The stated multiple comes from the fund’s registered name; the underlying is mapped by hand and checked against the name the exchange gives it. Funds whose underlying has no investable tracker are listed on ETFIQ and excluded here, because there is nothing to measure them against. Rebuilt every trading night. Data file: leverage.json.

Standards →
Where to next

ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Not investment advice.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ Research, The stated multiple and what the holder got, data as of Oct 27, 2026. https://etfiq.com/research/2026-10-27/leverage-label

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.