ETFIQ Research · rebuilt every trading night

The stated multiple and what the holder got

Over the three months to Oct 22, 2026, 478 of 654 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their own stated multiple. The median fund finished -3.8 points from its stated multiple.

These funds deliver the multiple over a single day and reset. Daily results compound, so a run of days is not the multiple times the period's move, and the gap widens with how far the underlying travels rather than with where it ends up. 129 underlyings carry the same stated multiple from more than one issuer. Same mandate, same days, and the spread between the closest and the furthest is in the second table.

Short of the stated multiple, by holding period
One month
285 of 694
Three months
478 of 654
Six months
318 of 419
One year
216 of 298
Three years
60 of 92

478 of 654 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their stated multiple over three months to Oct 22, 2026.

ETFIQ Narrative

Over the three months to October 22, 2026, 478 of 654 leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds finished short of their own stated multiple. The median fund finished 3.8 points short, having travelled a median distance of 5.3% from that target while the underlying it tracks moved with a median volatility of 47%.

This gap is not a flaw in any single fund. These products are built to deliver their stated multiple over one day, then reset and start again. Strung together, daily results compound rather than add, so the return over a run of days is not simply the multiple applied to the period's overall move. The data bears this out across holding periods: the median difference from stated widens from -0.1% at one month to -3.8% at three months, -7.8% at six months, -12.0% at one year, and -24.9% at three years, even as the number of funds with enough history to measure shrinks from 694 to 92. The gap tracks how far the underlying travelled along the way, not just where it ended up.

The volatility breakdown makes the same point from another angle. Funds tracking underlyings with volatility of 0% to 30% showed a median difference of -1.9% from stated, with 123 of 181 funds short. That median difference widens to -5.2% in the 30% to 50% band and to -7.7% in both the 50% to 80% and 80%-and-above bands, where 152 of 194 and 79 of 122 funds respectively finished short. Higher underlying volatility, more daily resets working against the path, more erosion from the stated multiple, regardless of where the underlying ultimately settled.

Where more than one issuer offers the same stated multiple on the same underlying, the outcomes still diverge. Among 129 underlyings with more than one issuer at the same mandate, the spread between the closest and furthest fund can run wide even though every fund is resetting daily against the same name. BABA +2x, tracked by four issuers while the underlying moved -10.7%, showed a spread of 11.4 points between KBAB at +7.3 and BABU at -4.1. CRML +2x, with two issuers and the underlying up 1.3%, showed a 9.7-point spread between CRMU at -23.9 and CRMX at -33.6. Smaller spreads also appear, such as CPER +2x at 3.8 points between CPXR and UCOP. Same stated multiple, same underlying, same days held, but different paths through daily compounding produce different results.

Readers can check the stated multiple, holding period, and distance from that multiple for any individual leveraged or inverse fund, along with its matched underlying, on ETFIQ's fund pages.

Short of the stated multiple, by the underlying’s volatility
0% to 30%
123 of 181
30% to 50%
124 of 157
50% to 80%
152 of 194
80% and above
79 of 122

478 of 654 leveraged and inverse ETFs finished short of their stated multiple over three months to Oct 22, 2026, grouped by how much the underlying moved.

How far from the stated multiple, by how long it was held

How far from the stated multiple, by how long it was held
WindowFundsShort of statedMedian differenceMedian distanceMedian underlying volatility
One month694285 of 694−0.1%1.8%44%
Three months654478 of 654−3.8%5.3%47%
Six months419318 of 419−7.8%8.9%42%
One year298216 of 298−12.0%13.6%34%
Three years9260 of 92−24.9%36.3%18%

The same trade from more than one issuer, widest spread first

The same trade from more than one issuer, widest spread first
OnIssuersUnderlying movedClosest to statedFurthestSpread
BABA +2x4−10.7%KBAB +7.3BABU -4.111.4%
CRML +2x2+1.3%CRMU -23.9CRMX -33.69.7%
BMNR +2x3+35.6%BNMC -18.0BMNG -24.76.7%
GME +2x2+18.9%GMEC -9.1GMEU -15.16.0%
PDD +2x2−5.0%KPDD -0.3PDDL -6.15.8%
NXPI +2x2−13.8%NXPG -3.4NXPX -9.05.6%
PLTR +2x5+59.0%PLTU +3.1PLTG -1.95.0%
MSTR +2x4+55.7%MSTC -15.8MSTX -20.64.8%
IONQ +2x3−8.5%IONC -13.6IONX -17.84.2%
RGTI +2x3−22.7%RGTC -4.2RGTX -8.44.2%
SPCX +2x7+22.4%SPCM -15.6SPCU -19.53.9%
CPER +2x2+0.6%CPXR -1.8UCOP -5.63.8%

Erosion against the underlying’s volatility, three months

Erosion against the underlying’s volatility, three months
Underlying volatilityFundsMedian volatilityMedian difference from statedShort of stated
0% to 30%18116%−1.9%123 of 181
30% to 50%15738%−5.2%124 of 157
50% to 80%19469%−7.7%152 of 194
80% and above12292%−7.7%79 of 122
Method

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation from Tiingo end-of-day prices with distributions reinvested, measured against the fund’s own underlying over exactly the same days. The stated multiple comes from the fund’s registered name; the underlying is mapped by hand and checked against the name the exchange gives it. Funds whose underlying has no investable tracker are listed on ETFIQ and excluded here, because there is nothing to measure them against. Rebuilt every trading night.

Data file: leverage.json. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards →

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ Research, The stated multiple and what the holder got, data as of Oct 22, 2026. https://etfiq.com/research/2026-10-22/leverage-label

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.