Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
TPZ vs ZAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TPZ returned +3.7% to ZAP's +4.0%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about TPZ and ZAPNet assets: $129m on May 31, 2026 for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF, and $451m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF.
55% of TPZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.
81% of ZAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ZAP costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| Measure | TPZ | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 6.3%, high on Apr 30, 2026 | 9.8%, high on Jun 25, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Electrification and the grid | Electrification and the grid |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, TPZ as of May 31, 2026 and ZAP as of Oct 12, 2026 | $129m | $451m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
A percentile among the 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 3, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 94 weekly returnsZAP returned more: +28.2% to +7.4%. ZAP swung slightly less: 15.0% to 16.4%. ZAP fell less at its worst: −11.1% to −14.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | TPZ | ZAP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +7.4% | +28.2% | ZAP | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +4.0% | +14.7% | ZAP | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +0.3% | +24.0% | ZAP | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.4% | 15.0% | ZAP (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.2% | 10.1% | ZAP | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −14.2% | −11.1% | ZAP | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.08 | 0.72 | ZAP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.11 | 1.08 | ZAP | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.28 | 1.32 | ZAP | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 94 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, TPZ and ZAP hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
20% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | TPZ | ZAP |
| 3 months | +0.3% | −1.7% |
| 6 months | −3.5% | −6.5% |
| 1 year | +3.7% | +4.0% |
| Since launchNot the same days: TPZ Dec 2024 · ZAP Dec 2024 | +12.6% | +34.6% |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
20% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
TPZ and ZAP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 52.7% of TPZ and 41.9% of ZAP, a gap of 10.8 points.
- Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- Cost. TPZ charges 0.85% of assets a year and ZAP 0.50%, a gap of 0.35 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
TPZ
By weight, 55% of TPZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Apr 30, 2026.
ZAP
By weight, 81% of ZAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 9.8% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do TPZ and ZAP hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, TPZ against ZAP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/tpz-vs-zap
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). TPZ against ZAP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/tpz-vs-zap
[TPZ against ZAP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/tpz-vs-zap)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.