ELFY vs ZAP: which is really different?

ELFY and ZAP hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and ELFY returned +8.7% over the year. ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF.

48.1%
ELFY in the S&P 500
75.5%
ZAP in the S&P 500
+8.7%
ELFY total return, 1 year
+4.9%
ZAP total return, 1 year
ELFY · 1 year to Sep 30, 202652% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
52% of its weight is outside the S&P 50048% of ELFY's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 52% is outside the index48%52%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 14% of the fund · 108 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in52% of its weight is outside the S&P 50048% of ELFY's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 52% is outside the index48%52%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 14% of the fund

48% of ELFY's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 52% is outside the index

ZAP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202625% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
25% of its weight is outside the S&P 50076% of ZAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 25% is outside the index76%25%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 44% of the fund · 47 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 15% in25% of its weight is outside the S&P 50076% of ZAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 25% is outside the index76%25%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 98% · top ten 44% of the fund

76% of ZAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 25% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ZAP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ELFY and ZAP hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

24% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ELFY ZAP
Mastec Inc 1.05% 1.41%
Talen Energy Corp 1.03% 1.38%
Quanta Services Inc 1.03% 4.71%
Eaton Corp Plc 0.94% 4.67%
Dominion Energy Inc 0.88% 4.27%
Ametek Inc 0.86% 4.63%
Entergy Corp 0.86% 3.79%
Hubbell Inc 0.84% 2.67%
Vistra Corp 0.83% 3.74%
Evergy Inc 0.83% 2.02%
Alliant Energy Corp 0.82% 1.83%
Oge Energy Corp 0.81% 1.07%
Only in ELFY
Sterling Infrastructure Inc 1.75%
Vicor Corp 1.66%
Bloom Energy Corp 1.49%
Powell Industries Inc 1.36%
Enphase Energy Inc 1.32%
First Solar Inc 1.28%
Ies Holdings Inc 1.28%
Nvent Electric Plc 1.28%
Only in ZAP
BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A 5.89%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 3.92%
NATIONAL GRID PLC-SP ADR 3.85%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY 3.79%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GP 3.65%
AMEREN CORPORATION 3.08%
EMERA INC 1.62%
PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL 1.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

24% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowELFYZAPELFYZAPELFYZAP
3 months−11.6%−9.8%−14.1 pts−12.3 pts−13.7 pts−11.9 pts
6 months−2.8%−5.3%−19.7 pts−22.3 pts−29.6 pts−32.2 pts
1 year+8.7%+4.9%−7.0 pts−10.8 pts−15.1 pts−18.9 pts
Since launch
ELFY Apr 2025 · ZAP Dec 2024
+49.7%+30.4%+1.9 pts−2.6 pts−17.2 pts−14.2 pts

ELFY and ZAP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ELFY
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF · Holds 108 stocks in electrification and the grid, 48% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF · Holds 47 stocks in electrification and the grid, 76% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer ALPS Global X
Theme Electrification and the grid Electrification and the grid
In the S&P 500 48.1% 75.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 94.6% 97.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 3.1% 15.3%
Holdings 108 47
Top ten, share of the fund 13.9% 43.8%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.53% 0.51%
Total return, 1 year +8.7% +4.9%
vs the S&P 500 −7.0 pts −10.8 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −15.1 pts −18.9 pts
Below its high −15.2% −12.6%
Net assets $203m $436m

ELFY and ZAP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ELFY in plain words

By weight, 48% of ELFY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 14% of the fund across 108 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +8.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

ZAP in plain words

By weight, 76% of ZAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 47 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.8 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ELFY and ZAP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ELFY or ZAP?
ELFY has 48% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ZAP has 76%, so ZAP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ELFY or ZAP?
ELFY charges 0.50% a year and ZAP charges 0.50%, so ELFY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ELFY against ZAP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/elfy-vs-zap

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.