Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SMHC vs XSD: Holdings Overlap & Returns
SMHC and XSD hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SMHC and XSD
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $11m for VanEck China Semiconductor ETF and $2.4bn for State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF.
0% of SMHC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
40% of XSD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 60% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XSD costs 0.30 points a year less; XSD is far larger, $2.4bn against $11m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SMHC | XSD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +34.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 50.7%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 31.8%, high on Jun 3, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 20.1 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 20.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $11m | $2.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SMHC and XSD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SMHC | XSD | SMHC | XSD |
| 3 months | −29.4% | −13.0% | not measured | −12.9 pts vs IVV |
| 6 months | – | −16.7% | – | −21.7 pts vs IVV |
| 1 year | – | +34.9% | – | +20.1 pts vs IVV |
| 3 years | – | +145.3% | – | +61.9 pts vs IVV |
| Since launchNot the same days: SMHC Jun 2026 · XSD Feb 2006 | −45.1% | +1,755.4% | not measured | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
SMHC
By weight, 0% of SMHC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Since it first traded on Jun 24, 2026 the fund returned −45.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 50.7% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
XSD
By weight, 40% of XSD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 89%. The top ten holdings are 31% of the fund across 46 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was ahead by 20.1 pts. It sits 31.8% below its all-time high of Jun 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do SMHC and XSD hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SMHC against XSD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smhc-vs-xsd
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SMHC against XSD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smhc-vs-xsd
[SMHC against XSD (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smhc-vs-xsd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.