Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SMH vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SMH returned +56.8% to URA's −30.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SMH and URA
Net assets: $71.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Semiconductor ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.
79% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.
0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SMH costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 87.1 points; SMH is 13.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SMH | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +56.8% | −30.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 15.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Semiconductors | Nuclear and uranium |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +13.4% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 43.4 pts | behind by 43.7 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $71.2bn | $5.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 773 weekly returns · each against ACWISMH returned more: +3,977.0% to +6.2%. SMH swung less: 26.9% to 35.7%. SMH fell less at its worst: −44.2% to −86.1%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SMH | URA | ACWI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +3,977.0% | +6.2% | SMH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +28.3% | +0.4% | SMH | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +3,365.0% | −30.2% | SMH | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 26.9% | 35.7% | SMH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 17.5% | 23.6% | SMH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −44.2% | −86.1% | SMH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 197.3% | 121.6% | 100.0% | SMH | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 117.1% | 125.5% | 100.0% | SMH (slight) | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.40 | 1.26 | 1.00 | URA lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.63 | 0.29 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 1.00 | 0.14 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.53 | 0.21 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.192 | 0.040 | 0.102 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.64 | 0.00 | SMH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | ACWI | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +12.6% a year | −7.9% a year | 0.0% | SMH significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 2.95 | −1.00 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | +4.2% to +20.9% | −23.3% to +7.5% | URA's includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.96 | −0.17 | SMH | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 17.4% | 30.4% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 773 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SMH and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SMH | URA | SMH | URA |
| 3 months | +12.6% | −2.6% | +8.2 pts vs ACWI | −7.0 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +13.6% | −30.9% | +6.2 pts vs ACWI | −38.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +56.8% | −30.3% | +43.4 pts vs ACWI | −43.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +316.0% | +65.5% | +227.1 pts vs ACWI | −23.4 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: SMH Dec 2011 · URA Nov 2010 | +4,348.4% | −45.1% | +3,938.6 pts vs ACWI | −417.4 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
SMH and URA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. SMH covers Semiconductors and URA covers Nuclear and uranium.
- What each follows. SMH follows Semiconductors and URA follows Nuclear and uranium.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SMH
By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +56.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 43.4 pts. It sits 15.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
URA
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do SMH and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SMH against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-ura
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SMH against URA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-ura
[SMH against URA (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-ura)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.