Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

RACK vs SNSR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

RACK and SNSR hold 5% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RACK and SNSR

Net assets: $68m on Nov 2, 2026 for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF, and $206m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Internet of Things ETF.

At a glance
79.0%
RACK in the S&P 500
30.8%
SNSR in the S&P 500
−23.3%
RACK total return, since launch, Jun 2, 2026
+26.6%
SNSR total return, 1 year
RACK · 3 months to Nov 4, 2026 21% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
21% of its weight is outside the S&P 50079% of RACK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.79%21%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 84% · top ten 43% of the fund · 50 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 42% in21% of its weight is outside the S&P 50079% of RACK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.79%21%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 84% · Nasdaq-100: 42% in

79% of RACK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

SNSR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 69% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of SNSR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.31%69%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 49% of the fund · 71 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 15% in69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of SNSR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.31%69%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 15% in

31% of SNSR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RACK costs 0.18 points a year less; SNSR is 2.7 times larger.

RACK vs SNSR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureRACKSNSR
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+26.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.3%, high on Jun 22, 202612.8%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDigital infrastructure and data centersDigital infrastructure and data centers
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.68%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$75m$206m
Holdings
Holdings in common5%

Method

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, RACK and SNSR hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RACK SNSR
Emerson Electric Co 2.06% 1.76%
Johnson Controls International plc 1.96% 1.66%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.05% 2.05%
Rambus Inc 0.67% 3.15%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RACK
Micron Technology Inc 5.31%
Amphenol Corp 4.85%
Sandisk Corp 4.57%
Cameco Corp 4.40%
Eaton Corp PLC 4.23%
Constellation Energy Corp 4.21%
Broadcom Inc 4.17%
NVIDIA Corp 4.10%
Only in SNSR
STMicroelectronics N.V. 7.44%
DEXCOM, INC. 6.35%
ADVANTECH Co., Ltd. 6.22%
Garmin Ltd. 5.84%
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 5.33%
Samsara Inc. 4.93%
MediaTek Inc. 3.74%
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC. 3.40%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: RACK vs SNSR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowRACKSNSR
3 months−16.5%−3.1%
6 months–+0.8%
1 year–+26.6%
3 years–+59.6%
Since launchNot the same days: RACK Jun 2026 · SNSR Sep 2016−23.3%+232.6%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF · Holds 50 stocks in digital infrastructure and data centers, 79% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF · Holds 71 stocks in digital infrastructure and data centers, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Digital infrastructure and data centers Digital infrastructure and data centers
In the S&P 500 79.0% 30.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 84.3% 97.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 41.9% 15.1%
Holdings 50 71
Top ten, share of the fund 43.1% 48.8%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.68%
Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.70%
Total return, 1 year −23.3% (since launch, Jun 2, 2026) +26.6%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −25.3% −12.8%
Net assets, RACK as of Nov 2, 2026 and SNSR as of Oct 12, 2026 $68m $206m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

RACK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RACK

By weight, 79% of RACK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Jun 2, 2026 the fund returned −23.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.3% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SNSR

By weight, 31% of SNSR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 71 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 12.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do RACK and SNSR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, RACK or SNSR?
RACK has 79% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SNSR has 31%, so SNSR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, RACK or SNSR?
RACK charges 0.50% a year and SNSR charges 0.68%, so RACK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RACK against SNSR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rack-vs-snsr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.