Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
PBD vs RNRG: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PBD returned −2.1% to RNRG's −4.3%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PBD and RNRGNet assets: $99m on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF, and $23m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF.
2% of PBD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 98% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
0% of RNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
RNRG costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; PBD is 4.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | PBD | RNRG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% | −4.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 56.6%, high on Jan 22, 2021 | 43.7%, high on Jan 7, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 19.0 pts | behind by 19.3 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $113m | $23m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PBD and RNRG hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
11% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PBD | RNRG | PBD | RNRG |
| 3 months | −12.4% | −7.4% | −10.8 pts vs EFA | −6.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −27.2% | −19.6% | −29.7 pts vs EFA | −22.2 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −2.1% | −4.3% | −19.0 pts vs EFA | −19.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +17.1% | +9.9% | −49.7 pts vs EFA | −67.7 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: PBD Jun 2007 · RNRG May 2015 | −17.6% | −6.4% | not measured | −224.5 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
11% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
PBD
By weight, 2% of PBD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 12% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +16.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index, so a holder was behind by 19.0 pts. It sits 56.6% below its all-time high of Jan 22, 2021.
RNRG
By weight, 0% of RNRG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −4.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 19.3 pts. It sits 43.7% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do PBD and RNRG hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PBD against RNRG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbd-vs-rnrg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). PBD against RNRG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbd-vs-rnrg
[PBD against RNRG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pbd-vs-rnrg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.