Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACES vs RNRG: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACES returned −16.6% to RNRG's −4.3%; 12% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACES and RNRG
Net assets: $109m on Aug 31, 2026 for ALPS Clean Energy ETF, and $23m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF.
17% of ACES's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
0% of RNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ACES costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACES | RNRG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −16.6% | −4.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 70.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021 | 43.7%, high on Jan 7, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 19.3 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, ACES as of Aug 31, 2026 and RNRG as of Oct 12, 2026 | $109m | $23m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACES and RNRG hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
12% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACES | RNRG | ACES | RNRG |
| 3 months | −10.8% | −7.4% | not measured | −6.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −22.6% | −19.6% | not measured | −22.2 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −16.6% | −4.3% | not measured | −19.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | −10.6% | +9.9% | not measured | −67.7 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACES Jun 2018 · RNRG May 2015 | +20.8% | −6.4% | not measured | −224.5 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
12% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
ACES
By weight, 17% of ACES's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 36 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 70.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
RNRG
By weight, 0% of RNRG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −4.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 19.3 pts. It sits 43.7% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do ACES and RNRG hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACES against RNRG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aces-vs-rnrg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACES against RNRG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aces-vs-rnrg
[ACES against RNRG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aces-vs-rnrg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.