PAVE vs RBLD: which is really different?
PAVE and RBLD hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and PAVE returned +11.2% over the year. Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF.
64% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index
82% of RBLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PAVE and RBLD hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
22% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PAVE | RBLD | PAVE | RBLD | PAVE | RBLD |
| 3 months | −9.0% | −6.5% | −11.5 pts | −9.0 pts | −11.1 pts | −8.6 pts |
| 6 months | +1.8% | +1.1% | −15.2 pts | −15.8 pts | −25.1 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +11.2% | +10.5% | −4.5 pts | −5.2 pts | −12.6 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 3 years | +76.5% | +69.0% | −8.5 pts | −16.0 pts | −33.5 pts | −41.0 pts |
| Since launch PAVE Mar 2017 · RBLD Jan 2010 | +278.2% | +177.9% | +2.6 pts | −626.7 pts | −226.4 pts | −1559.6 pts |
PAVE and RBLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
PAVE and RBLD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PAVE in plain words
By weight, 64% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 102 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +11.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 4.5 pts. It sits 12.3% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
RBLD in plain words
By weight, 82% of RBLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 13% of the fund across 104 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. It sits 8.7% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do PAVE and RBLD hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, PAVE against RBLD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-rbld
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PAVE against RBLD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-rbld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, PAVE against RBLD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-rbld
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). PAVE against RBLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-rbld
- Markdown
- [PAVE against RBLD (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pave-vs-rbld)