NLR vs TNUK: which is really different?

NLR and TNUK hold 45% of their weight in the same names. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF and Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF.

15.8%
NLR in the S&P 500
17.5%
TNUK in the S&P 500
−21.8%
NLR total return, 1 year
−11.8%
TNUK total return, since launch
NLR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 25 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund

16% of NLR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

TNUK · 6 months to Sep 30, 202683% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
83% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index18%83%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 62% of the fund · 25 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in83% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index18%83%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 62% of the fund

18% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · NLR scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NLR and TNUK hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

45% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NLR TNUK
Cameco Corp 8.16% 7.48%
Bwx Technologies Inc 6.20% 6.66%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.67% 4.75%
Constellation Energy Corp 8.17% 4.51%
Fortum Oyj 7.17% 4.50%
Uranium Energy Corp 4.33% 4.97%
Centrus Energy Corp 3.81% 4.23%
Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 4.56% 2.31%
Oklo Inc 5.14% 1.77%
Nuscale Power Corp 3.89% 1.73%
Nexgen Energy Ltd 5.57% 1.29%
Denison Mines Corp 4.10% 1.09%
Only in NLR
Cgn Power Co Ltd 5.28%
X-Energy Inc 4.37%
Paladin Energy Ltd 4.05%
Yellow Cake Plc 3.04%
Kepco Engineering & Construction Co Inc 2.94%
Cgn Mining Co Ltd 1.68%
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc 1.36%
Silex Systems Ltd 1.27%
Only in TNUK
Curtiss-Wright Corp 8.15%
Doosan Enerbility Co Ltd 6.94%
Talen Energy Corp 6.90%
Mirion Technologies Inc 6.22%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC 5.06%
Vistra Corp 4.70%
Amentum Holdings Inc 4.16%
AtkinsRealis Group Inc 4.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

45% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowNLRTNUKNLRTNUKNLRTNUK
3 months−9.9%−10.1%−12.4 pts−12.6 pts−12.1 pts−12.2 pts
6 months−23.0%−15.3%−40.0 pts−32.3 pts−49.9 pts−42.2 pts
1 year−21.8%not published−37.5 ptsnot published−45.6 ptsnot published
3 years+57.6%not published−27.4 ptsnot published−52.4 ptsnot published
Since launch
NLR Jan 2010 · TNUK Dec 2025
+158.9%−11.8%−645.7 pts−25.7 pts−1578.6 pts−33.8 pts

NLR and TNUK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF · Holds 25 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · Holds 25 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VanEck Tortoise
Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 15.8% 17.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.2% 4.5%
Holdings 25 25
Top ten, share of the fund 62.3% 61.8%
Expense ratio 0.52% 0.85%
Fee for the differing part 0.52% 0.86%
Total return, 1 year −21.8% −11.8% (since launch on Dec 18, 2025)
vs the S&P 500 −37.5 pts −25.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −45.6 pts −33.8 pts
Below its high −37.1% −26.4%
Net assets $3.5bn $2m

NLR and TNUK on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NLR in plain words

By weight, 16% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −21.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 37.5 pts. It sits 37.1% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

TNUK in plain words

By weight, 18% of TNUK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on Dec 18, 2025 the fund returned −11.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.9% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.7 pts. It sits 26.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NLR and TNUK hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 45% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NLR or TNUK?
NLR has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TNUK has 18%, so NLR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NLR or TNUK?
NLR charges 0.52% a year and TNUK charges 0.85%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NLR against TNUK, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nlr-vs-tnuk

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.