ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFOpen liveAsk about these two funds

NFRX vs RBLD: which is really different?

RBLD holds 81.8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and NFRX 56.3%. Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF.

RBLD costs 0.15 points a year less; NFRX is 2.5 times larger.

NFRXRBLD
Expense ratio0.80%0.65%
Net assets, NFRX as of Jun 30, 2026 and RBLD as of Oct 8, 2026$106m$42m
Total return, 1 yearnot published+13.7%
What it tracksInfrastructureInfrastructure
Holdings in commonnot published
S&P 500, total return, since Jan 30, 2026+13.4%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, since Jan 30, 2026behind by 12.8 pts
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 3.5 pts
Below its all-time high8.7%, high on Feb 27, 20265.2%, high on Jun 25, 2026
56.3%
NFRX in the S&P 500
81.8%
RBLD in the S&P 500
+0.6%
NFRX total return, since launch
+13.7%
RBLD total return, 1 year
NFRX · 6 months to Oct 9, 202644% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
44% of its weight is outside the S&P 50056% of NFRX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 44% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.56%44%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 44% of the fund · 34 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 13% in44% of its weight is outside the S&P 50056% of NFRX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 44% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.56%44%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 13% in

56% of NFRX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 44% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

RBLD · 1 year to Oct 9, 202618% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of RBLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.82%18%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 13% of the fund · 101 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of RBLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.82%18%in the S&P 50018% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 8% in

82% of RBLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · NFRX scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowNFRXRBLDNFRXRBLDNFRXRBLD
3 months−7.3%−3.6%−10.7 pts−6.9 pts−10.9 pts−7.2 pts
6 months−7.8%+0.8%−22.9 pts−14.3 pts−31.0 pts−22.4 pts
1 yearnot published+13.7%not published−3.5 ptsnot published−9.9 pts
3 yearsnot published+74.0%not published−11.8 ptsnot published−33.3 pts
Since launch
NFRX Jan 2026 · RBLD Oct 2008
+0.6%+323.0%−12.8 pts−735.4 pts−20.6 pts−2,277.8 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NFRX
Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF · Holds 34 stocks in infrastructure, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF · Holds 101 stocks in infrastructure, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer not established First Trust
Theme Infrastructure Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 56.3% 81.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.2% 91.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 13.4% 8.0%
Holdings 34 101
Top ten, share of the fund 44.1% 12.6%
Expense ratio 0.80% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.81% 0.71%
Total return, 1 year +0.6% (since it first traded on Jan 30, 2026) +13.7%
vs the S&P 500 −12.8 pts −3.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −20.6 pts −9.9 pts
Below its high −8.7% −5.2%
Net assets, NFRX as of Jun 30, 2026 and RBLD as of Oct 8, 2026 $106m $42m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NFRX in plain words

By weight, 56% of NFRX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 34 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Jan 30, 2026 the fund returned +0.6% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.8 pts. It sits 8.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

RBLD in plain words

By weight, 82% of RBLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 13% of the fund across 101 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.5 pts. It sits 5.2% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, NFRX or RBLD?
NFRX has 56% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RBLD has 82%, so NFRX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NFRX or RBLD?
NFRX charges 0.80% a year and RBLD charges 0.65%, so RBLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
NFRX vs RIFRNFRX vs GLIXNFRX vs EFRANFRX vs UPGRRBLD vs BILTRBLD vs BLDXRBLD vs CSIORBLD vs RIFR
NFRX on its own →RBLD on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
NFRX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RBLD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RBLD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for RBLD ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NFRX against RBLD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfrx-vs-rbld

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.