NFRX vs PAVE: which is really different?
PAVE holds 63.9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and NFRX 56.3%. Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF.
PAVE costs 0.33 points a year less; PAVE is far larger, $13.6bn against $106m.
| NFRX | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.80% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, NFRX as of Jun 30, 2026 and PAVE as of Oct 8, 2026 | $106m | $13.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +13.2% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, since Jan 30, 2026 | +13.4% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, since Jan 30, 2026 | behind by 12.8 pts | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 4.1 pts | |
| Below its all-time high | 8.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 10.8%, high on Jun 25, 2026 |
56% of NFRX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 44% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
64% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NFRX | PAVE | NFRX | PAVE | NFRX | PAVE |
| 3 months | −7.3% | −5.7% | −10.7 pts | −9.1 pts | −10.9 pts | −9.4 pts |
| 6 months | −7.8% | −2.0% | −22.9 pts | −17.2 pts | −31.0 pts | −25.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +13.2% | not published | −4.1 pts | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +78.0% | not published | −7.8 pts | not published | −29.3 pts |
| Since launch NFRX Jan 2026 · PAVE Mar 2017 | +0.6% | +285.0% | −12.8 pts | +1.6 pts | −20.6 pts | −228.9 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NFRX in plain words
By weight, 56% of NFRX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 34 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Jan 30, 2026 the fund returned +0.6% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.8 pts. It sits 8.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
PAVE in plain words
By weight, 64% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 100 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. It sits 10.8% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, NFRX against PAVE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfrx-vs-pave
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). NFRX against PAVE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfrx-vs-pave
[NFRX against PAVE (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfrx-vs-pave)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.