IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

METL vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, METL returned +6.9% to SLVP's +31.0%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about METL and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $66m for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

METL on its own →SLVP on its own →
At a glance
14.2%
METL in the S&P 500
5.3%
SLVP in the S&P 500
+6.9%
METL total return, 1 year
+31.0%
SLVP total return, 1 year
METL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 86% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
86% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.14%86%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in86% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.14%86%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

14% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 72% of the fund · 37 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%5% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.1 points; SLVP is 12.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

METL vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureMETLSLVP
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.9%+31.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high33.0%, high on Jan 28, 202633.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksMiners and metalsSilver miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 7.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 7.9 ptsahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.99%0.39%
Net assets$66m$799m
Holdings
Holdings in common13%

Method

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, METL and SLVP hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first METL SLVP
Endeavour Silver Corp. 3.74% 3.79%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 2.19% 4.78%
GoGold Resources Inc. 2.05% 1.86%
Pan American Silver Corp. 2.09% 1.63%
Vizsla Silver Corp. 3.28% 1.54%
Coeur Mining Inc. 1.01% 1.64%
Sovereign Metals Ltd. 0.55% 3.21%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in METL
Nucor Corp. 5.14%
Major Drilling Group International Inc. 4.50%
Steel Dynamics Inc. 4.29%
Reliance Inc. 4.17%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.01%
NexGen Energy Ltd. 3.75%
Cameco Corp. 3.37%
Lundin Mining Corp. 3.37%
Only in SLVP
HECLA MINING 13.56%
INDUST PENOLES 11.08%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%
FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%
NEWMONT 5.32%
AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 4.99%
DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: METL vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowMETLSLVPMETLSLVP
3 months−16.2%−6.8%−16.1 pts vs VOO−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months−26.0%−14.7%−31.0 pts vs VOO−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year+6.9%+31.0%−7.9 pts vs VOO+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years–+257.6%–+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: METL Sep 2025 · SLVP Feb 2012+12.3%+53.4%−6.9 pts vs VOO−314.3 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · Holds 45 stocks in miners and metals, 14% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott iShares
Theme Miners and metals Silver miners
In the S&P 500 14.2% 5.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 45 37
Top ten, share of the fund 39.6% 72.1%
Expense ratio 0.99% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.99% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year +6.9% +31.0%
vs its benchmark −7.9 pts vs VOO +16.0 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −33.0% −33.0%
Net assets $66m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

13% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

SLVP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
METL

By weight, 14% of METL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do METL and SLVP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, METL or SLVP?
METL has 14% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so SLVP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, METL or SLVP?
METL charges 0.99% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
METL vs SILJMETL vs SILMETL vs AGMIMETL vs PICKSLVP vs NIKLSLVP vs SLXSLVP vs PICKSLVP vs GOAU
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →METL on its own →SLVP on its own →METL dividend history →METL holdings →SLVP dividend history →SLVP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
METL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
METL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Sprott page for METL ↗
SLVP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
SLVP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
iShares page for SLVP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, METL against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.