Data as of .
NIKL vs SLVP: which is really different?
NIKL and SLVP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SLVP returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NIKL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and SLVP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NIKL | Only in SLVP |
|---|---|
| ANTAM Persero Tbk PT 14.86% | HECLA MINING 14.50% |
| Nickel Industries Ltd. 11.93% | INDUST PENOLES 11.00% |
| Merdeka Battery Materials Tbk PT 11.52% | FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.86% |
| IGO Ltd. 8.25% | FRESNILLO PLC 8.20% |
| Talon Metals Corp. 6.48% | AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 4.88% |
| Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 4.75% | DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.59% |
| Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk PT 4.62% | WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 4.57% |
| Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.24% | NEWMONT 4.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | SLVP | NIKL | SLVP | NIKL | SLVP | |
| 3 months | +0.7% | +16.9% | −1.6 pts | +14.6 pts | +3.1 pts | +19.4 pts |
| 6 months | −1.4% | +22.9% | −19.4 pts | +4.9 pts | −25.6 pts | −1.4 pts |
| 1 year | +10.8% | +62.7% | −5.8 pts | +46.1 pts | −11.0 pts | +40.9 pts |
| 3 years | −7.1% | +329.2% | −85.5 pts | +250.8 pts | −105.3 pts | +231.1 pts |
| Since launch | −12.2% | +86.9% | −115.1 pts | −554.5 pts | −152.3 pts | −1149.6 pts |
| NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF Holds 26 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF Holds 50 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | iShares |
| Theme | Miners and metals | Silver miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 26 | 50 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 74.4% | 71.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% | +62.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −5.8 pts | +46.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −11.0 pts | +40.9 pts |
| Below its high | −30.3% | −18.4% |
| Net assets | $57m | $986m |
NIKL in plain words
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 30.3% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
SLVP in plain words
By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +62.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 46.1 pts. It sits 18.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do NIKL and SLVP hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NIKL or SLVP?
- NIKL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so NIKL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NIKL or SLVP?
- NIKL charges 0.75% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NIKL against SLVP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-slvp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.