Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LFSC vs XDAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LFSC returned +43.6% to XDAT's −11.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LFSC and XDAT
Net assets: $126m on Aug 31, 2026 for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF, and $3.7m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Exponential Data ETF.
0% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
60% of XDAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 40% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XDAT costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 55.1 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LFSC | XDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +43.6% | −11.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 5.7%, high on Aug 19, 2026 | 21.1%, high on Nov 9, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 28.8 pts | behind by 26.3 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, LFSC as of Aug 31, 2026 and XDAT as of Nov 3, 2026 | $126m | $3.7m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LFSC and XDAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LFSC | XDAT | LFSC | XDAT |
| 3 months | −3.8% | −7.7% | −3.5 pts vs IWV | −7.4 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | +16.9% | +2.1% | +12.0 pts vs IWV | −2.8 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +43.6% | −11.5% | +28.8 pts vs IWV | −26.3 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | – | +33.3% | – | −47.7 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: LFSC Oct 2024 · XDAT Jan 2021 | +83.4% | −1.8% | +46.4 pts vs IWV | −106.1 pts vs IWV |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Total Return, so a holder was ahead by 28.8 pts.
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 5.7% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −11.5% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 26.3 pts.
By weight, 60% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 21.1% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do LFSC and XDAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LFSC against XDAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lfsc-vs-xdat
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LFSC against XDAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lfsc-vs-xdat
[LFSC against XDAT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lfsc-vs-xdat)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.