Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

KDEF vs MISL: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KDEF returned −28.3% to MISL's −2.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KDEF and MISL

Net assets: $113m on Aug 31, 2026 for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF, and $685m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
KDEF in the S&P 500
65.9%
MISL in the S&P 500
−28.3%
KDEF total return, 1 year
−2.3%
MISL total return, 1 year
KDEF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 70% of the fund · 20 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of KDEF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

MISL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 34% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
34% of its weight is outside the S&P 50066% of MISL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.66%34%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 60% of the fund · 44 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 21% in34% of its weight is outside the S&P 50066% of MISL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.66%34%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 97% · Nasdaq-100: 21% in

66% of MISL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

MISL costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.0 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

KDEF vs MISL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKDEFMISL
Return
Total return, 1 year−28.3%−2.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high50.7%, high on May 5, 202619.1%, high on Jan 16, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksDefenseDefense
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 17.1 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 17.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.60%
Net assets, KDEF as of Aug 31, 2026 and MISL as of Nov 3, 2026$113m$685m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 14, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 89 weekly returns
KDEF MISL
Return
Total return edge MISL +33.5% +39.1%
Annualized edge MISL +18.4% +21.2%
Price return edge MISL +25.4% +38.3%
Risk
Volatility edge MISL 50.9% 24.1%
Max drawdown edge MISL −51.6% −20.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MISL 0.51 0.75
Sortino edge MISL 0.74 1.19
Calmar edge MISL 0.36 1.06
Reading

From Feb 2025 to Oct 2026, MISL returned more: +39.1% to +33.5%. MISL swung less: 24.1% to 50.9%. MISL fell less at its worst: −20.0% to −51.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: KDEF vs MISL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKDEFMISLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+33.5%+39.1%MISLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.4%+21.2%MISLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+25.4%+38.3%MISLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility50.9%24.1%MISLSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation34.7%15.3%MISLLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−51.6%−20.0%MISLDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.510.75MISLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.741.19MISLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.361.06MISLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 89 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KDEF and MISL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KDEF MISL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KDEF
HANWHA AEROSPACE CO LTD 23.38%
HYUNDAI ROTEM COMPANY 7.63%
KOREA AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES LTD 6.71%
LIG DEFENSE & AEROSPACE CO LTD 6.67%
POONGSAN CORP 6.04%
SK OCEANPLANT CO LTD 4.33%
SNT MOTIV CO LTD 4.25%
SNT DYNAMICS CO LTD 3.94%
Only in MISL
RTX Corporation 8.62%
GE Aerospace 8.18%
The Boeing Company 7.16%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (Class A) 6.84%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 6.60%
Lockheed Martin Corporation 4.93%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 4.61%
Northrop Grumman Corporation 4.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: KDEF vs MISL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowKDEFMISLKDEFMISL
3 months−22.9%−10.2%not measured−10.1 pts vs VOO
6 months−49.1%−7.5%not measured−12.5 pts vs VOO
1 year−28.3%−2.3%not measured−17.1 pts vs VOO
3 years–+79.3%–−4.0 pts vs VOO
Since launchNot the same days: KDEF Feb 2025 · MISL Oct 2022+60.9%+103.7%not measured−8.3 pts vs VOO

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF · Holds 20 stocks in defense, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 44 stocks in defense, 66% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Defense Defense
In the S&P 500 0.0% 65.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 97.4%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 20.5%
Holdings 20 44
Top ten, share of the fund 70.4% 60.2%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.60%
Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.62%
Total return, 1 year −28.3% −2.3%
vs its benchmark not measured −17.1 pts vs VOO
Below its high −50.7% −19.1%
Net assets, KDEF as of Aug 31, 2026 and MISL as of Nov 3, 2026 $113m $685m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MISL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KDEF

By weight, 0% of KDEF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 20 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −28.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 50.7% below its all-time high of May 5, 2026.

MISL

By weight, 66% of MISL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 44 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 17.1 pts. It sits 19.1% below its all-time high of Jan 16, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KDEF and MISL hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KDEF or MISL?
KDEF has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MISL has 66%, so KDEF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KDEF or MISL?
KDEF charges 0.65% a year and MISL charges 0.60%, so MISL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KDEF against MISL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kdef-vs-misl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.