Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
IVES vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
IVES costs 0.25 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | IVES | LUMA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.1% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 14.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 33.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | AI infrastructure and chips |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 3.0 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +12.1% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 3.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.00% |
| Net assets, IVES as of Jul 31, 2026 and LUMA as of Nov 11, 2026 | $986m | $10m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
76% of IVES's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 24% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
19% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IVES and LUMA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IVES | LUMA | IVES | LUMA |
| 3 months | −10.3% | −29.0% | −7.9 pts vs VOO | −20.7 pts vs EEM |
| 6 months | −2.4% | – | −4.2 pts vs VOO | – |
| 1 year | +9.1% | – | −3.0 pts vs VOO | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: IVES Jun 2025 · LUMA Jul 2026 | +42.8% | −23.5% | +13.5 pts vs VOO | −16.7 pts vs EEM |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
IVES
By weight, 76% of IVES's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 66%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 the fund returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested against +12.1% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
LUMA
By weight, 19% of LUMA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 27 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 11, 2026. Since it first traded on Jul 15, 2026 the fund returned −23.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.8% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do IVES and LUMA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVES against LUMA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ives-vs-luma
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). IVES against LUMA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ives-vs-luma
[IVES against LUMA (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ives-vs-luma)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
IVES and LUMA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
IVES and LUMA
Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.
IVES −10.3%, LUMA −29.0%: IVES +18.7 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.