IGF vs TOLZ: which is really different?
IGF and TOLZ hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and TOLZ returned +8.1% over the year. iShares Global Infrastructure ETF and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF.
IGF costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IGF is far larger, $10.3bn against $162m.
| IGF | TOLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, IGF as of Oct 8, 2026 and TOLZ as of Oct 9, 2026 | $10.3bn | $162m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | +8.1% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 11.9 pts | behind by 9.2 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 7.5%, high on Mar 2, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
34% of TOLZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGF and TOLZ hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
34% in common
34% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IGF | TOLZ | IGF | TOLZ | IGF | TOLZ |
| 3 months | −6.2% | −5.5% | −9.6 pts | −8.8 pts | −9.9 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 6 months | −7.3% | −6.9% | −22.4 pts | −22.1 pts | −30.5 pts | −30.1 pts |
| 1 year | +5.3% | +8.1% | −11.9 pts | −9.2 pts | −18.2 pts | −15.5 pts |
| 3 years | +62.1% | +51.4% | −23.6 pts | −34.4 pts | −45.1 pts | −55.9 pts |
| Since launch IGF Dec 2007 · TOLZ Mar 2014 | +129.4% | +111.3% | −508.6 pts | −308.8 pts | −1,460.7 pts | −740.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGF in plain words
By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
TOLZ in plain words
By weight, 34% of TOLZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 39% of the fund across 115 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +8.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do IGF and TOLZ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, IGF against TOLZ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igf-vs-tolz
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IGF against TOLZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igf-vs-tolz
[IGF against TOLZ (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igf-vs-tolz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.