IDNA vs XBI: which is really different?
IDNA and XBI hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and IDNA returned +73.5% over the year. iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.
XBI costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.5 points; XBI is far larger, $9.9bn against $320m.
| IDNA | XBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, IDNA as of Oct 9, 2026 and XBI as of Oct 8, 2026 | $320m | $9.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +73.5% | +45.0% |
| What it tracks | Genomics and gene editing | Biotech |
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 56.2 pts | ahead by 27.7 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 20.2%, high on Sep 2, 2021 | 11.1%, high on Feb 8, 2021 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
25% of IDNA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
13% of XBI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IDNA and XBI hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
20% in common
20% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IDNA | XBI | IDNA | XBI | IDNA | XBI |
| 3 months | +25.7% | −3.3% | +22.3 pts | −6.7 pts | +22.0 pts | −7.0 pts |
| 6 months | +44.4% | +18.9% | +29.3 pts | +3.8 pts | +21.2 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +73.5% | +45.0% | +56.2 pts | +27.7 pts | +49.9 pts | +21.4 pts |
| 3 years | +117.5% | +114.6% | +31.7 pts | +28.8 pts | +10.2 pts | +7.3 pts |
| Since launch IDNA Jun 2019 · XBI Feb 2006 | +79.7% | +890.7% | −120.4 pts | +92.2 pts | −249.5 pts | −1,164.7 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDNA in plain words
By weight, 25% of IDNA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +73.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 56.2 pts. It sits 20.2% below its all-time high of Sep 2, 2021.
XBI in plain words
By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +45.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.7 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do IDNA and XBI hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, IDNA against XBI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/idna-vs-xbi
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IDNA against XBI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/idna-vs-xbi
[IDNA against XBI (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/idna-vs-xbi)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.