GLIX vs RBLD: which is really different?
RBLD holds 81.8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and GLIX 49.3%. Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF.
RBLD costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; RBLD is 1.4 times larger.
| GLIX | RBLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, GLIX as of Jun 30, 2026 and RBLD as of Oct 8, 2026 | $30m | $42m |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.4% | +13.7% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 10.8 pts | behind by 3.5 pts |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Below its all-time high | 7.1%, high on Jun 26, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Jun 25, 2026 |
49% of GLIX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 51% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
82% of RBLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GLIX | RBLD | GLIX | RBLD | GLIX | RBLD |
| 3 months | −5.9% | −3.6% | −9.3 pts | −6.9 pts | −9.6 pts | −7.2 pts |
| 6 months | −5.3% | +0.8% | −20.4 pts | −14.3 pts | −28.5 pts | −22.4 pts |
| 1 year | +6.4% | +13.7% | −10.8 pts | −3.5 pts | −17.2 pts | −9.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +74.0% | not published | −11.8 pts | not published | −33.3 pts |
| Since launch GLIX Oct 2025 · RBLD Oct 2008 | +6.4% | +323.0% | −10.8 pts | −735.4 pts | −17.8 pts | −2,277.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLIX in plain words
By weight, 49% of GLIX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 27 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.8 pts. It sits 7.1% below its all-time high of Jun 26, 2026.
RBLD in plain words
By weight, 82% of RBLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 13% of the fund across 101 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.5 pts. It sits 5.2% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, GLIX against RBLD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-rbld
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GLIX against RBLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-rbld
[GLIX against RBLD (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-rbld)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.