Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GDXJ vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GDXJ returned +14.8% to QTUM's +28.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXJ and QTUM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.6bn for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF and $5.4bn for Defiance Quantum ETF.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.
38% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.
Pair scorecard
QTUM costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points; GDXJ is 1.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXJ | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +28.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 14.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Quantum computing |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.4% | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.40% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.6bn | $5.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41% | 18% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 423 weekly returnsQTUM returned more: +489.3% to +310.7%. QTUM swung less: 26.3% to 43.9%. QTUM fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −54.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GDXJ | QTUM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +310.7% | +489.3% | QTUM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +19.0% | +24.4% | QTUM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +270.6% | +450.1% | QTUM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 43.9% | 26.3% | QTUM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 30.1% | 17.6% | QTUM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −54.1% | −38.1% | QTUM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.56 | 0.86 | QTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.82 | 1.28 | QTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.35 | 0.64 | QTUM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 423 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and QTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXJ | QTUM | GDXJ | QTUM |
| 3 months | +9.9% | +9.1% | +5.5 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | −8.0% | +11.2% | −15.4 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | +14.8% | +28.9% | +1.4 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 3 years | +220.2% | +229.7% | +131.3 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDXJ Nov 2009 · QTUM Sep 2018 | +44.9% | +522.8% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
GDXJ and QTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. GDXJ covers Gold miners and QTUM covers Quantum computing.
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 40.8% of GDXJ and 18.5% of QTUM, a gap of 22.3 points.
- What each follows. GDXJ follows Gold miners and QTUM follows Quantum computing.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
QTUM
By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and QTUM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXJ against QTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-qtum
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GDXJ against QTUM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-qtum
[GDXJ against QTUM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-qtum)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.