Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDOC vs XDAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDOC returned +15.5% to XDAT's −11.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDOC and XDAT
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $20m for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF and $3.7m for Franklin Exponential Data ETF.
63% of GDOC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
60% of XDAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 40% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XDAT costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.0 points; GDOC is 5.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDOC | XDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.5% | −11.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 21.1%, high on Nov 9, 2021 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 26.3 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $20m | $3.7m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDOC and XDAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDOC | XDAT | GDOC | XDAT |
| 3 months | +9.2% | −7.7% | not measured | −7.4 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | +23.1% | +2.1% | not measured | −2.8 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +15.5% | −11.5% | not measured | −26.3 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | +37.3% | +33.3% | not measured | −47.7 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDOC Nov 2021 · XDAT Jan 2021 | +2.6% | −1.8% | not measured | −106.1 pts vs IWV |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
GDOC
By weight, 62% of GDOC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −11.5% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 26.3 pts.
By weight, 60% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 21.1% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do GDOC and XDAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDOC against XDAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdoc-vs-xdat
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDOC against XDAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdoc-vs-xdat
[GDOC against XDAT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdoc-vs-xdat)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.