Data as of .
GDOC vs XDAT: which is really different?
GDOC and XDAT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and GDOC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDOC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDOC and XDAT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDOC | Only in XDAT |
|---|---|
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 13.48% | CLOUDFLARE INC 10.14% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 8.19% | ALPHABET INC 9.76% |
| MERCK & COMPANY INC 6.04% | META PLATFORMS INC 6.43% |
| GUARDANT HEALTH INC 5.42% | SNOWFLAKE INC 5.03% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 4.92% | APPLOVIN CORP 5.02% |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 4.59% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 4.54% |
| ARGENX SE 4.13% | CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 4.39% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC 3.96% | DATADOG INC 4.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDOC | XDAT | GDOC | XDAT | GDOC | XDAT | |
| 3 months | +11.7% | +10.6% | +9.5 pts | +8.3 pts | +14.2 pts | +13.1 pts |
| 6 months | +16.6% | +23.9% | −1.4 pts | +5.9 pts | −7.6 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +13.9% | −4.8% | −2.6 pts | −21.4 pts | −7.8 pts | −26.6 pts |
| 3 years | +19.5% | +47.1% | −58.9 pts | −31.3 pts | −78.7 pts | −51.1 pts |
| Since launch | −4.3% | +9.1% | −79.9 pts | −108.2 pts | −94.4 pts | −127.9 pts |
| GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF Holds 41 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 57% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Franklin |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 56.7% | 61.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.3% | 86.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 9.4% | 49.6% |
| Holdings | 41 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 58.2% | 56.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.79% | 0.58% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.9% | −4.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −2.6 pts | −21.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −7.8 pts | −26.6 pts |
| Below its high | −4.5% | −12.3% |
| Net assets | $19m | $4m |
GDOC in plain words
By weight, 57% of GDOC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +13.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.6 pts.
XDAT in plain words
By weight, 61% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 21.4 pts. It sits 12.3% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do GDOC and XDAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDOC or XDAT?
- GDOC has 57% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XDAT has 61%, so GDOC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GDOC or XDAT?
- GDOC charges 0.75% a year and XDAT charges 0.50%, so XDAT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDOC against XDAT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdoc-vs-xdat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.