Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GDMN vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDMN returned +11.8% to RING's +28.4%; 63% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDMN and RING

Net assets: $221m on Aug 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund, and $2.3bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
11.7%
GDMN in the S&P 500
17.6%
RING in the S&P 500
+11.8%
GDMN total return, 1 year
+28.4%
RING total return, 1 year
GDMN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 88% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 55% of the fund · 54 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

12% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

RING · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 82% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RING costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.6 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GDMN vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGDMNRING
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.8%+28.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high44.7%, high on Jan 28, 202625.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.45%0.39%
Net assets, GDMN as of Aug 31, 2026 and RING as of Nov 4, 2026$221m$2.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common63%

Method

Risk and return

Dec 23, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026 · 253 weekly returns
GDMN RING
Return
Total return edge GDMN +219.2% +174.7%
Annualized edge GDMN +26.9% +23.1%
Price return edge RING (slight) +142.4% +155.2%
Risk
Volatility edge RING 49.2% 39.7%
Max drawdown edge RING (slight) −50.9% −46.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GDMN (slight) 0.65 0.62
Sortino edge GDMN (slight) 1.02 0.98
Calmar edge GDMN (slight) 0.53 0.50
Reading

From Dec 2021 to Oct 2026, GDMN returned more: +219.2% to +174.7%. RING swung less: 39.7% to 49.2%. RING fell slightly less at its worst: −46.4% to −50.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GDMN vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGDMNRINGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+219.2%+174.7%GDMNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+26.9%+23.1%GDMNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+142.4%+155.2%RING (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility49.2%39.7%RINGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation31.2%25.0%RINGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.9%−46.4%RING (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.650.62GDMN (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.020.98GDMN (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.530.50GDMN (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 253 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

63%

By the books each fund has filed, GDMN and RING hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

63% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GDMN RING
NEWMONT CORP 11.66% 17.65%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD 7.23% 12.79%
BARRICK MINING CORP 7.09% 8.72%
GOLD FIELDS LTD 4.58% 4.51%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 5.95% 4.40%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP 4.04% 7.33%
KINROSS GOLD CORP 4.82% 3.74%
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP 2.93% 3.02%
ALAMOS GOLD INC 2.26% 2.36%
COEUR MINING INC 1.93% 2.84%
ENDEAVOUR MINING PLC 1.83% 2.01%
IAMGOLD CORP 1.51% 2.11%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GDMN
FRANCO-NEVADA CORP 3.75%
EVOLUTION MINING LTD 3.19%
NORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTD 3.07%
ROYAL GOLD INC 2.65%
HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LTD 1.64%
DPM METALS INC 1.39%
ZIJIN MINING GROUP CO LTD 1.34%
FRESNILLO PLC 1.29%
Only in RING
HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITE 1.92%
TOREX RESOURCES 1.27%
ZIJIN GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD 1.18%
CHINA GOLD INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES 1.11%
PAN AFRICAN RESOURCES PLC 0.85%
EMERALD RESOURCES 0.75%
HOCHSCHILD MINING PLC 0.75%
WEST AFRICAN RESOURCES LTD 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GDMN vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGDMNRINGGDMNRING
3 months−5.4%+2.4%not measured+3.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months−22.4%−7.2%not measured−9.8 pts vs ACWI
1 year+11.8%+28.4%not measured+13.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years+294.4%+233.8%not measured+156.2 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: GDMN Dec 2021 · RING Feb 2012+269.7%+74.0%not measured−293.7 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund · Holds 54 stocks in gold miners, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in gold miners, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Gold miners
In the S&P 500 11.7% 17.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 54 41
Top ten, share of the fund 55.4% 67.5%
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.45% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year +11.8% +28.4%
vs its benchmark not measured +13.4 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −44.7% −25.1%
Net assets, GDMN as of Aug 31, 2026 and RING as of Nov 4, 2026 $221m $2.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

63% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RING flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GDMN

By weight, 12% of GDMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 44.7% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

RING

By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GDMN and RING hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 63% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDMN or RING?
GDMN has 12% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RING has 18%, so GDMN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GDMN or RING?
GDMN charges 0.45% a year and RING charges 0.39%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDMN against RING, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdmn-vs-ring

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.