Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FOWF vs MISL: which is really different?

FOWF and MISL hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and FOWF returned more over the year.

Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF and First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF.

73.5%FOWF in the S&P 500
62.4%MISL in the S&P 500
+12.7%FOWF total return, 1 year
+6.4%MISL total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: MISL scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

FOWF 22.8MISL 43.30.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FOWF27% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
74%27%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 47% of the fund · 86 holdings filed Apr 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 14% in74%27%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 88% · top ten 47% of the fund
MISL38% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
62%38%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 63% of the fund · 40 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 12% in62%38%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 98% · top ten 63% of the fund

34% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FOWF and MISL hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FOWF and MISL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFOWFMISL
Boeing Co/The7.51%7.48%
RTX Corp6.76%8.30%
Lockheed Martin Corp6.39%4.27%
Northrop Grumman Corp5.58%4.10%
General Dynamics Corp7.55%3.95%
L3Harris Technologies Inc3.24%3.57%
Leidos Holdings Inc2.08%1.81%
Howmet Aerospace Inc0.80%3.56%
Palantir Technologies Inc0.63%11.75%
TransDigm Group Inc0.56%3.53%
Airbus SE0.61%0.51%
Only in each
Only in FOWFOnly in MISL
BAE Systems PLC 3.98%Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (Class A) 8.81%
Dell Technologies Inc 2.10%GE Aerospace 7.34%
Honeywell International Inc 1.66%HEICO Corporation 3.56%
Nokia Oyj 1.41%Rocket Lab Corporation 3.34%
Vertiv Holdings Co 1.17%AST SpaceMobile, Inc. 2.56%
Corning Inc 1.10%Curtiss-Wright Corporation 2.37%
Keysight Technologies Inc 1.09%FTAI Aviation Ltd. 2.21%
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc 1.00%Woodward, Inc. 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FOWF and MISL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
FOWFMISLFOWFMISLFOWFMISL
3 months+2.2%−8.7%−0.1 pts−10.9 pts+4.7 pts−6.2 pts
6 months+5.6%−7.5%−12.4 pts−25.5 pts−18.6 pts−31.7 pts
1 year+12.7%+6.4%−3.9 pts−10.2 pts−9.1 pts−15.4 pts
3 yearsnot published+93.1%not published+14.7 ptsnot published−5.1 pts
Since launch+43.5%+109.5%+10.6 pts−0.6 pts+2.6 pts−56.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FOWF and MISL on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
Holds 86 stocks in defense, 74% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
Holds 40 stocks in defense, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerPacerFirst Trust
ThemeDefenseDefense
In the S&P 50073.5%62.4%
Active share vs the S&P 50088.4%97.5%
In the Nasdaq-10013.7%11.8%
Holdings8640
Top ten, share of the fund46.9%63.1%
Expense ratio0.49%0.60%
Fee for the differing part0.55%0.62%
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+6.4%
vs the S&P 500−3.9 pts−10.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−9.1 pts−15.4 pts
Below its high−8.4%−16.9%
Net assets$15m$704m

FOWF in plain words

By weight, 74% of FOWF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 86 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.9 pts. It sits 8.4% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

MISL in plain words

By weight, 62% of MISL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 40 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.2 pts. It sits 16.9% below its all-time high of Jan 16, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FOWF and MISL hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FOWF or MISL?
FOWF has 74% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MISL has 62%, so MISL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FOWF or MISL?
FOWF charges 0.49% a year and MISL charges 0.60%, so FOWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FOWF against MISL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FOWF against MISL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fowf-vs-misl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources