Data as of .
FDN vs URA: which is really different?
FDN holds 82.4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and URA 0.0%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: URA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.43% | CAMECO CORP 22.39% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.78% | SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.25% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 5.91% | OKLO INC 5.12% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.18% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.79% | NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.51% | PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.44% | ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | URA | FDN | URA | FDN | URA | |
| 3 months | +9.3% | −4.4% | +6.0 pts | −7.7 pts | +10.1 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +20.3% | −11.7% | +4.3 pts | −27.7 pts | −0.4 pts | −32.4 pts |
| 1 year | +1.9% | +7.0% | −15.6 pts | −10.5 pts | −21.0 pts | −15.9 pts |
| 3 years | +69.5% | +100.1% | −8.4 pts | +22.2 pts | −25.6 pts | +5.0 pts |
| Since launch | +1031.5% | −34.6% | +227.1 pts | −758.0 pts | −642.4 pts | −1460.8 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund Holds 42 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | URA Global X Uranium ETF Holds 58 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 42 | 58 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.5% | 60.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.9% | +7.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −15.6 pts | −10.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.0 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Below its high | −2.1% | −50.4% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +1.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.6 pts.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or URA?
- FDN has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or URA?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against URA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-ura Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.