Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDN vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDN returned −1.1% to SIL's +18.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDN and SIL
Net assets: $5.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund, and $4.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Silver Miners ETF.
82% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
FDN costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.4 points; FDN is 1.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FDN | SIL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.1% | +18.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 6.3%, high on Oct 9, 2026 | 34.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Internet and e-commerce | Silver miners |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 14.8 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.7% | +13.4% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 14.8 pts | ahead by 4.9 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $5.4bn | $4.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 860 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: FDN against IVV, Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; SIL against ACWI, Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
FDN returned more: +931.3% to +93.6%. FDN swung less: 23.0% to 39.9%. FDN fell less at its worst: −53.4% to −82.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FDN | SIL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +931.3% | +93.6% | FDN | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.2% | +4.1% | FDN | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +929.5% | +62.4% | FDN | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.0% | 39.9% | FDN | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.5% | 27.5% | FDN | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −53.4% | −82.3% | FDN | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 138.3% | 84.6% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 113.1% | 100.9% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.03 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.71 | 0.18 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.26 | FDN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.98 | 0.38 | FDN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.121 | 0.101 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.28 | 0.05 | FDN | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IVV | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +1.8% a year | +0.6% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.64 | 0.07 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −3.8% to +7.4% | −16.9% to +18.2% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.26 | 0.03 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 13.2% | 36.2% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 860 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FDN | SIL | FDN | SIL |
| 3 months | +5.5% | +6.3% | −0.6 pts vs IVV | +1.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +7.7% | −10.2% | −1.4 pts vs IVV | −17.6 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −1.1% | +18.3% | −14.8 pts vs IVV | +4.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +89.6% | +227.9% | −5.8 pts vs IVV | +139.0 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: FDN Jun 2006 · SIL Apr 2010 | +1,282.2% | +109.0% | not measured | −286.2 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
FDN and SIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. FDN covers Internet and e-commerce and SIL covers Silver miners.
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 61.1% of FDN and 76.3% of SIL, a gap of 15.2 points.
- What each follows. FDN follows Internet and e-commerce and SIL follows Silver miners.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FDN
By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 14.8 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.
SIL
By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. It sits 34.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and SIL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDN against SIL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-sil
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDN against SIL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-sil
[FDN against SIL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-sil)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.